[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Does Etch support Intel Woodcrest Xeon processors?



On 12/29/06, Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> wrote:
There are 2 meaning for 'support': Some companies
'support' certain OS's meaning that you can pay money and get technical
support,the other meaning is that the computer can run the OS.

Yeah that's what I thought. Everyone I've spoken to about this has
told me that Etch will work no problem and I think the issue is 'they'
don't want to support Debian due to lack of technical resources.

Regards
Justin

On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 09:17:47PM +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
> Quick question.
>
> I'm trying to setup a new server and am looking at hardware
> configurations for the server. I've been told by the sales person that
> Debian can not be installed on an Intel Woodcrest Xeon processor.
>
> The original quote from them is as follows, "We can not do Debian or
> FreeBSD on these servers however as the latest versions of those OS do
> not support this hardware yet. We can do CentOS, RHES or Fedora."
>
> Is this correct?
> --
> Regards
Hi Justin Hartman,
AFAICT hardware support is provided by the kernel and its modules.
Unless thoese OS's have proprietary, or super-secret code, it sounds
like nonsense. There are 2 meaning for 'support': Some companies
'support' certain OS's meaning that you can pay money and get technical
support,the other meaning is that the computer can run the OS.
cheers,
Kev
--
|  .''`.  == Debian GNU/Linux == |       my web site:       |
| : :' :      The  Universal     | debian.home.pipeline.com |
| `. `'      Operating System    | go to counter.li.org and |
|   `-    http://www.debian.org/ |    be counted! #238656   |
|     my keysever: pgp.mit.edu   |     my NPO: cfsg.org     |


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFlXTzv8UcC1qRZVMRAlwMAJwKk5nO+L6OAYGMwtsm/+RtgGfOEgCeNEgE
a2o7qh/QH+kG5JjyYR0e2y4=
=FbKp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





--
Regards
Justin Hartman
PGP Key ID: 102CC123



Reply to: