Re: jigdo and its files
In article <[🔎] 200612141915.18129.alianson@shaw.ca> you write:
>On Thu December 14 2006 19:06, Peter Colton wrote:
>> On Friday 15 December 2006 02:53, Alan Ianson wrote:
>> >
>> > I had a look in a few other arch's and they don't have any -binary in the
>> > filenames, those are the ones I would get. The -binary means the iso's
>> > are for binary packages as opposed to -source packages.
>>
>> Thanks for your replie Alan
>>
>> As you pointed out in the other arch's its just :
>> debian-testing-arch's-DVD-1.jigdo
>>
>> So this jigdo file type as the source and the binary for the package ?
>
>I think this is binary packages just as before but the -binary is
>assumed. The source iso's have -source in the filename. That's just
>an uneducated guess though.. :)
Yup, that's exactly it. The images have just changed name, and some
old files were left by (my) mistake. Now fixed.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone
Reply to: