Re: A market perspective on the impact of dunc-tanc
Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> writes:
> I think my statement was meant to say that most contributions to
> Debian are by people who are not getting paid. Would that be closer to
> a fact?
Of course. But what of it? The real question is whether it matters or
not. As I mentioned in another post, paid and volunteer positions are
not simply the same thing +/- some cash -- there are big differences in
reponsibilities, motivation, control, etc. Volunteers aren't
volunteering randomly, they get gain benefits from their activity (or
else they wouldn't do it); arguably these benefits are often _stronger_
motivations than money might be. I'm sure there are some people who
might be so put out by the presence of any paid developers that they'd
quit, but I think most DDs are made of stronger stuff than that.
There could be more vague "social" effects, like a reduction in the
feeling of "we're all in this together" -- but I think it would take a
_significant_ presence of paid developers to cause any real
change. [What was the actual number hired? Two?]
-Miles
--
80% of success is just showing up. --Woody Allen
Reply to: