[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fairly dumb question about icewm floppy icon and desktop software....



Libranet used to use IceWM as default. If their archives are still
around, that would agood place to find out a lot about IceWM. As I
remember it, you have to edit a text file. Sorry I can't be more
helpful

Cheers,

Brian

On 11/30/06, Michael Fothergill <mikef20000@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Debian folks,

I recently stuck a 13 GB drive in a Gateway 2000 Pentium 133 Mhz ancient PC.

I loaded Sarge 3.1 r3 on it.

This was a slow process and involved a certain amount of farting around in
the installation but in the end it worked.

On a machine like this gnome is a non-starter.  It is too slow.

So I bunged icewm on instead and it works OK speed wise.

It feels right.

But I have some ignorances that are spoiling my fun a bit.

One thing is that I can't seem to find any icon for the floppy like there is
in gnome.

What do you do here?  Do you open a terminal window put the floppy in and
use the mount command to read it?

What about a CD?

Another problem I have is that Openoffice takes ages to load and I think the
machine is struggling a bit with it.

There doesn't seem to be any abiword or whatever it is in the default icewm
installation.  Presumably if I install abiword using apt then it will be
automatically incorporated into the icon set up and I will be able to fire
it up from the window manager....

It's shame that Openoffice 1.1 is so slow because I like what it does....

A smaller spreadsheet software would also be useful.

I ended up using the openoffice print manager or whatever it is to configure
the printer.

I trust this is what you are supposed to do.  It didn't have as many drivers
as the gnome beastie and so I am not sure if it will drive the Epson C86
smelly inkjet printer I use.

I will do what I can with it.

Suggestions on how to get this system to work about as well as can be
expected given the old hardwre would be appreciated.

Regards

Michael Fothergill



Reply to: