On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:50:52PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > Do you really need to have rev. 1764? The xaralx package 0.7r1692-2 from > the testing/non-free repository works fine for me. > That works here. Regarding your observation whether I _really_ need it, I can just say I am curious to try new version for the new features, etc. But, the question is more about a software that ran perfectly not running on an upgraded system. The particular version which ran under sarge no longer runs under etch. FWIW, I was using the xorg packages from backports under sarge. > How did you install the newer version? If you compiled it yourself then > you might simply have to recompile it for Etch. > Running the tarball. Tried the 1692 tarball from xaraxtreme.org; that also segfaults :-( Regards, -- Sridhar M.A. GPG KeyID : F6A35935 Fingerprint: D172 22C4 7CDC D9CD 62B5 55C1 2A69 D5D8 F6A3 5935 Chihuahuas drive me crazy. I can't stand anything that shivers when it's warm.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature