Re: emacs without documentation nonsense

[hendrik@topoi.pooq.com]

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:00:37AM +0000, Tyler wrote:
> I don't know that it's enough reason to go on living, but you will find 
> those docs (in)conveniently stored in the package 
> emacs21-common-non-dfsg, in the non-free repos.
> 
> At some point I wonder if the devs will realize that they undermine 
> their efforts to encourage users to use a dfsg-free system by all but 
> forcing us into the non-free repos for basic documentation?

Which devs are the ones responsible here: the Debian devs who put it 
there, or the upstream ones that presumably put non-free constraints on 
the documentatin license?  Or is it all a big misunderstanding?

-- hendrik