Re: Etch kernel
On Monday 13 November 2006 02:21, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Sunday, 12.11.2006 at 23:32 +0530, Amit Joshi wrote:
> > For example, the Sarge CDs provide the 2.6.8 (tagged as unstable)
> > kernel.
>
> I didn't think the Sarge 2.6 kernel was technically 'unstable' - the
> installer gave two options: 2.4 or 2.6; although 2.4 was the default,
> there was certainly never any implication that by choosing 2.6 you were
> opening yourself to an 'unstable' environment...
>
> Dave.
Yes. Technically speaking, it wasn't 'unstable'. But then its Debian. Whatever
is not rigorously tested, is to be tagged as unstable/testing.. :P
--
Regards,
Amit.
Remember fellas, what we do in life echoes in eternity!
Reply to: