[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ca-certificates



On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 23:12:16 +0100
Florian Kulzer <florian@molphys.leidenuniv.nl> wrote:


> can nevertheless run "apt-get install -f" or "aptitude install -f" in a
> terminal and copy/paste the entire output into an email.)

Having the same issue here for sometime...

rw-r--r-- 1 root root 93040 2006-10-27 10:47
ca-certificates_20061027_all.deb dfox@m206-157:/var/cache/apt/archives$
sudo aptitude install -f ca-certificates_20061027_all.deb Password:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
Building tag database... Done
Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched
"ca-certificates_20061027_all.deb" The following packages have been
kept back: gdm libxalan2-java libxerces2-java
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
Setting up ca-certificates (20061027) ...
Updating certificates in /etc/ssl/certs....dpkg: error processing
ca-certificates (--configure): subprocess post-installation script
returned error exit status 126 Errors were encountered while processing:
 ca-certificates
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
Setting up ca-certificates (20061027) ...
Updating certificates in /etc/ssl/certs....dpkg: error processing
ca-certificates (--configure): subprocess post-installation script
returned error exit status 126 Errors were encountered while processing:
 ca-certificates
dfox@m206-157:/var/cache/apt/archives$


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
David E. Fox                              Thanks for letting me
dfox@tsoft.com                            change magnetic patterns
dfox@m206-157.dsl.tsoft.com               on your hard disk.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: