On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:37:01PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 10/18/06 20:04, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:02:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> There's Xen. And VMware. > >> > >> VMware has been around for years, and is a known, rock-solid > >> hypervisor. > >> > > Actually, I believe that Xen is a virtualizer. Or do they have > > different approaches for their workstation and server products? > > "Generic" Xen is a paravirtualizer. > > Xen 3.0.2+ on modern Intel and AMD CPUs allows for hardware > virtualization. The technology code names are Vanderpool and Pacifica. > Oops. I mean to say: "I believe that *VMWare* is a virtualizer." Sorry. > > Good point. Not just that, though, but reliable bandwidth. No sense > > having lots of bandwidth if it is unreliable. > > ???? > > Who makes unreliable server-class hardware anymore? > Who spends $$$$ on server hardware and then holds it together with a $50 switch? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature