Re: spamcop

[John Kelly <jak@isp2dial.com>]

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:53:28 -0500, "Seth Goodman"
<sethg@GoodmanAssociates.com> wrote:

>> The improper DNS false positive rate is low, less than 2%.

>It's a pity, but very few people think in terms of winning the spam war
>anymore.  Most systems would consider this false positive rate unusable
>by a large margin.  The larger the provider, the less workable this
>solution.

That's the fear factor.

But once you get a grip and hang on for a while, you realize that
sacrificing 2% is a piece of cake.