[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: laser printer recommendation for personal use?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/15/06 05:50, B.Hoffmann wrote:
> Hello dear list users,
> 
> it's been a while (6 years) since I last owned a printer but now the
> time has come where it looks needed at home.
> 
> Always liked the Samsung or Brother models due to small footprint and
> looks (well one can argue about that) but not sure how good they are
> with Linux and specifically our favourite distro.
> 
> Talking about b/w laser printer. As it's for personal use the highest
> page number per minute is not essential, and 4MB memory would probably
> be overkill.
> Important to me is 1.) usb connectivity these days and/or 2.) ethernet
> to connect to my router (D-link DI-604) for better accessibility from
> all machines over the network.
> Ethernet connectivity would be nice and I could forgo usb then. (No wifi
> in this house for at least another two years.)
> 
> Machines here are all using 2.6.xx kernels, the power specc'ed one
> Debian Etch, an old Duron one Ubuntu 5.10 (which will probably be
> changed to Etch as well later in the year) and usually one other distro
> to play around /test.
> 
> Thank you for your suggestions. Hope this is not OT.

With the LaserJet 1100 getting old in the tooth, and the kids
entering 2nd Grade, we decided a color printer would be best.  But,
of course, ink jets are expensive to operate and the ink runs out at
inopportune moments.  So I got a Dell 3100cn on sale for $350.
Color laser with PostScript3.  Network and USB capable.  Works fine
with CUPS, but you've got to tell it that the 3100cn is a Lexmark.
(Google will tell you which model number.)

The only problem is that it's *huge*, 21"x17"x17" hwd.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFCqoAS9HxQb37XmcRAphmAKDUomEmsQqJzlmLsB33i4anREuZHwCfcXdf
zTtFmGbqAPucp7V6mRnrf6A=
=3ANv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: