[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Fluxbox + Firefox slow



Firefox and fluxbox is working great for me,I'm using the latest fluxbox.

On 7/22/06, Nick Lidakis <nlidakis@verizon.net> wrote:
Nick Wright wrote:
> I use fluxbox as my window manager. Its pretty sweet for most stuff --
> light and fast. However when scrolling around in firefox the system is
> brought to its knees (CPU load spikes to 80-90%). This also happens
> quite a bit when altering the focus between firefox and other windows.
>
> I use a focus-on-mouse-pointer setup which means the focus can shift
> quite quickly a number of times which can exacerbating the problem.
>
> The video card is a pci geforce 2 which is reasonable for 2D
> performance. This is a (dual) P3 system at 866mhz.
>
> Does anyone else find the same thing? Can you recommend any
> alternatives to firefox that perform better in fluxbox (and obviously
> is as featureful as possible)
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
I have been using the open box window manager with Firefox (Debian
unstable with kernel 2.6.16 (preempt on)) on an AMD 3500+ & 2 gigabytes
of RAM.  I also notice the same behavior. The video card is a  7900GTX
PCI-express with the latest NVIDIA driver , 1.0-8762 driver.  The
problem was much worse with open source drivers and one of several (7500
AGP DVI, 9000 Pro DVI, 9250 DVI) ATI cards. Things seemed a little
better with the open nv driver, and slightly better still with the
nvidia driver.

An example of a website that gave me serious headaches was www.eham.net.
Painfully slow scrolling with the ATI cards. The CPU still gets pegged
at 100% with the nvidia driver, but scrolls much (click on the product
reviews link to bring your browser to a crawl) faster. Scrolling between
desktops in openbox, I can watch as the inside of the firefox window is
being redrawn; same for most GTK2 apps. Openbox draws the window
decorations instantly, so I doubt is a window manager issue.

The 7900GTX is driving a IBM l200p flat panel to 1600x1200 resolution.
The strange thing is, these apps are much snappier on my Thinkpad x41
with integrated Intel grpahics and a 1024x768 LCD. The eHam website was
never much of a problem as far as scrolling. So I wonder if the
performance hit is a combination of high resolution and GTK2 apps. I
posted an inquiry a while back on this list, never got a response.

I never seem to have any issues with QT apps like K3B or K9copy though.

Nick



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org





Reply to: