Re: Replying to list
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
It's not a FAQ, it's a FFF (Frequent Flame Fest) around here. There
are three ways of doing things in this world: the Right Way, the Wrong
Way, and the Debian Way. Welcome to the Debian Way.
A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to the
originator, rather than the list - for which I apologise. All other -
non-Debian - lists to which I subscribe use this field and it enables
one to concentrate on the message, rather than the postman:-)
I finally just decided "Screw 'Em". I hit Reply-To-All and let the
Debianistas receive two copies.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
Reply to: