Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
From: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 20:13:02 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] ejEa_.A.vW.6rCiEB@mobilix.private>
In-reply-to: <20060526170847.GA6431@flx.demon.nl>
References: <20060526170847.GA6431@flx.demon.nl>

Am 2006-05-26 19:08:47, schrieb Felix C. Stegerman:

> So it comes down to:
>   * Is it a bad idea to use unstable on a production server when it
>     comes to security?

YES

>   * If so, would you recommend using testing, or stable?

Stable with selected backports IF NEEDED!

>   * And does anyone with experience running unstable on production
>     servers know of any other caveats I should be aware of?

I do not want to shoot me into my feets...

Greetings
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSM LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
  - From: "s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Unidentified subject!
Next by Date: Re: Round robin DNS type of service
Previous by thread: Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
Next by thread: Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread