On Sunday 07 May 2006 15:16, Steve Lamb wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > Accept it, only deliver to the negative user would be the sane way of > > handling it. Either that, or 550 it and say "Delivered to ..., not > > delivered to ..." > > You're not understanding the problem. Think of it at the SMTP level, > we're filtering there, right? Ok. > > rcpt to: foo@bar.com > rcpt to: baz@bar.com > data > blah blah blah.... > . > FILTERING HERE. > > Who's settings do you use? Both. > Even worse, which Bayesian database do you > use? Both. > Regardless, SMTP time checks are system wide, not user specific. If > users want their own filters it will have to be after your system has > accepted the message. At that point it is no longer SMTP time checking and > outside the scope of both sa-exim and exiscan. At that point you're onto > the MDA which is either Exim's own internal routines controlled by a > specially formatted .forward file, procmail or what have you. Has nothing been done to fix this? -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): baloo@ursine.ca Jabber: Because it's time to move forward http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber
Attachment:
pgpHbWIIu3AWp.pgp
Description: PGP signature