[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ALERT! /dev/sda1 does not exist. Dropping to a shell...



Thank you very much Predrag and Kent for you reply. Actually i was
working on VMWare, it was a long time dealing with this problem, but i
could not solve it. Now i have reinstalled the Ubuntu using IDE. Lets
see what happen once i compile 2.6.16 kernel. I hope it will work.
But i will not leave this questions unanswered, soon i will reinstall
Ubuntu on 2.6.16 kerel using SCSI and keep in mind your suggestions.
Surely, i will let you guys know the results.

Thanks...

Regards,
Fawad.


On 5/4/06, Predrag Gavrilovic <gavrilovic@gmail.com> wrote:
This may be relevant to Debian too. I had (maybe still have) same
problem with Debian etch instalation on IBM xSeries 346. I beleive
this is a problem with initramfs-tools (there is a bug reported) and
this should be fixed in next initarmfstools version in testing.
After installation from daily build etch (a week ago) system wouldn't boot.
Workaround is to compile kernel with scsi and avoid using initrd, or
to use yaird for creating initrd image.

2006/5/4, Fawad Nazir <fawad.nazir@gmail.com>:
> Hi All,
>
> I installing Ubuntu 5.10 with 2.6.16 kernel. Everything went well but
> when i restarted the kernel it gave me the:
>
> ALERT! /dev/sda1 does not exist. Dropping to a shell
> BusyBox v1.00-pre10 (Debian 20040623-1ubuntu22) Build-in shell (ash)
> Enter 'help' for a list of build-in command
> /bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
> #
>
>
> I modified the /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, and now it looks like: (Also attached)
>
> sd_mod
> arcmsr
> scsi_mod
> dmesg
> mptspi
>
> The entry in /boot/grub/menu.lst is: (Also attached)
>
> title           Ubuntu, kernel 2.6.16
> root            (hd0,0)
> kernel          /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.16 root=/dev/sda1 ro quiet splash
> initrd          /boot/initrd.img-2.6.16
> boot
>
> Also my /etc/mkinitramfs/initramfs.conf is attached.
>
> Please let know where/what i am doing wrong.
>
> I will be thankful...
> --
> Fawad Nazir
>
>
>




--
Fawad Nazir



Reply to: