On 2006-04-22T19:07:02-0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Saturday 22 April 2006 14:35, Allan Wind wrote: > > On 2006-04-22T13:32:13-0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > Can it do per-user spamc configs (like dman's old spamassasin setup)? > > > > This would be a spamassasin configuration item for you to look into, I > > don't know off hand. > > Well, the MTA needs to run spamc as the user that will be receiving the mail. amavis-new, which I use, appears to communicate with postfix using its policy delegation protocol, and uses a perl API to communicate with spamassasin. You can certainly run spamc from procmail and do so per user, but can you configure postfix to run spamc on a per user basis? > > Performance wise, you are better off running > > spamassasin daemons rather than spamc, and I do so via amavisd-new. > > Umm, spamd is worthless without spamc to connect to it. Thanks for catching that. What I meant to say is that you are better off using amavis-new than spamc, as you avoid forks. /Allan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature