[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ATTN: Barbara Oncay



Hi Gene an *,

Am 2006-04-14 03:45:06, schrieb Gene Heskett:

> All you protestors might want to be aware that as I see your pgp signed 
> messages here, without your keys, the added stuff about unsubbing is 
> not visible here even if I view the pgp signature.  So I have to assume 
> that when the server relays your messages, it doesn't append those 
> unsub instructions which might fubar your pgp sigs.

I have posted it allready to the BTS but gotten no reponse.

The GPG signed messages looking like:

----8<--------------------------------------------------------------

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEPzhEv8UcC1qRZVMRAlWIAJ0a+w6Y0TvEaYRnjk//huF3P77XPQCdEtY0
d0it1WULXVdGipB0QwfLGu8=
=Fjpa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

----8<--------------------------------------------------------------

which mean, the Debian-Added-Signature will not show up.

All "murphy" (The List-Server) must do, is to edit the last Boundary
from

        --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--
to
        --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ

(see the removed two "--") and add the 

        --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--

to the end of the message.  Then, the Debian-Added-Signature will
show up again.

Greetings
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)



Reply to: