Re: procmail vs. exim (was: Re: Proposed change for subscriptions...)
On Saturday 18 March 2006 15:35, Steve Lamb wrote:
>s. keeling said:
>> I doubt you'd bother to flame Fortran as you've been abusing
>> procmail.
>
> Of course, my "abuse" is directly perportional to the amount of
> times any particular, ill-suited, poorly written tool is elevated to
> the status of a geek icon when other, bettern designed, just as
> useful and widely propigated tools are available. Uttering FORTRAN's
> name in a Rainman like reaction at every possible utterance of a mail
> problem and you'll see the same reaction.
>
>"Oh, I need a mail fil..."
>
>"Procmail."
>
>"...ter which can check on different hea..."
>
>"Yeah, Procmail."
>
>"..ders and run it through a bayes..."
>
>"Procmail, yea, Procmail..."
>
>"..ian filter. Since Exim has filtering, could it be done in that?"
>
>"Procmail... Procmail..."
>
And you point is? (ducks and runs) :)
>--
>Steve Lamb
--
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Reply to: