[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: hotplug script before udev



On 3/8/06, Florian Kulzer <florian@molphys.leidenuniv.nl> wrote:
> David Berg wrote:
> > On 3/8/06, Florian Kulzer <florian@molphys.leidenuniv.nl> wrote:
> >
> >>David Berg wrote:
> >>
> >>>I'm trying to automount my digital camera (mass storage) when it is
> >>>connected.  I have udev scripts to give me a /dev/camera symlink which
> >>>appears to be working, and created a map in hotplug to call a script
> >>>called photodl which seems to be getting called.
> >>>
> >>>The problem is that photodl is called before the device is created from udev.
>
> [...]
>
> >>>How can I ensure that photodl is run after the device is created?
> >>
> >>I think the most reliable way is to use the PROGRAM key in your udev
> >>rule for the device. The following is an example for a PCMCIA network card:
> >>
> >>KERNEL=="eth*", SYSFS{address}=="xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx", NAME="wlan0", PROGRAM="/path/to/your/script"
> >>
> >>(all on the same line)
> >>
> >>/path/to/your/script should point to your script. It will be called
> >>whenever the device is created or removed. In the script you can check
> >>the $ACTION environmental variable ("add" or "remove") to know which
> >>event occurred. The manpage of udev has more details.
> >>
> >
> >
> > I was under the impression that udev's sole purpose was to name /dev
> > entries.  And that hotplug is the apropriate place for calling scripts
> > that will use that device.
> >
> > I'm still foggy on how some of these systems fit together.  Does it
> > matter?  Looking at the hotplug scripts it would appear that scripts
> > could be called from hotplug, udev, or hal.  Which is most
> > appropriate.
>
> As far as I know, udev replaces hotplug. As you point out, udev's main

I'm running sarge, and udev .056-3 still depends on hotplug.

> purpose is to generate the device entries in /dev as needed, but it also
> incorporates the functionality of hotplug. I had the impression that
> this was done because udev cannot really coexist with hotplug: When udev
> is installed hotplug is removed from the system, and you are asked to
> purge its configuration files. This lead me to believe that it is best
> to go "100% udev" for all device configuration and plug-in scripting.

I suppose it would depend on how hotplug was merged into udev.  From
you description it sould like I should use udev just to avoid
complications when I upgrade to etch.

Reply to: