Re: firefox memory leak
On 2/20/06, Linas Zvirblis <0x0007@gmail.com> wrote:
> And what makes you think it is Firefox to blame? Do you regain the
> memory after shutting down Firefox? Please check memory usage using
> "top" or similar application and post the outcomes.
After last post, it started hanging.
I am not BLAMING but SUSPECTING firefox from bacports NOT from debian.
I think memory leak will not be regained after the application is
closed. Even after closing the application causing leak, memory can't
be regained as it hangs anf becomes unusable. I hope dev gurus here
will agree with me. further as I said no other application was
running.
Yes I have checked randomly FF uses CPU time even 90% and memory 40%.
Here is the timed free for this boot
After booting with konsole on
lvgandhi@lvgdell600m:~$ date
Mon Feb 20 15:38:01 UTC 2006
lvgandhi@lvgdell600m:~$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 515736 244780 270956 0 23552 127480
-/+ buffers/cache: 93748 421988
Swap: 506008 0 506008
After and only ff started
lvgandhi@lvgdell600m:~$ date;free
Mon Feb 20 15:38:40 UTC 2006
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 515736 278100 237636 0 23908 147584
-/+ buffers/cache: 106608 409128
Swap: 506008 0 506008
lvgandhi@lvgdell600m:~$ date;free
Mon Feb 20 15:43:54 UTC 2006
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 515736 363012 152724 0 24688 152284
-/+ buffers/cache: 186040 329696
Swap: 506008 0 506008
lvgandhi@lvgdell600m:~$ date;free
Mon Feb 20 15:54:09 UTC 2006
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 515736 509708 6028 0 22764 136664
-/+ buffers/cache: 350280 165456
Swap: 506008 0 506008
lvgandhi@lvgdell600m:~$ date;free
Mon Feb 20 16:02:48 UTC 2006
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 515736 509952 5784 0 20388 114292
-/+ buffers/cache: 375272 140464
Swap: 506008 0 506008
lvgandhi@lvgdell600m:~$
> By the way, is it backported Firefox? If so, Debian project can take no
> responsibility for it.
I am not talking about responsibilty. Many users here use firefox from
bacports as ff1.5 is vailable there.
--
L.V.Gandhi
http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/
linux user No.205042
Reply to: