Re: minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Clive Menzies <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk>
Subject: Re: minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address
From: "Daniel B." <REMOVEdanielTHIS@fgm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:08:55 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 43F39867.5090405@fgm.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060215183616.GG4595@clivemenzies.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 43F36BB3.2050002@fgm.com> <[🔎] 20060215183616.GG4595@clivemenzies.co.uk>

Clive Menzies wrote:

On (15/02/06 12:58), Daniel B. wrote:

What anti-spam method minimizes the network bandwith used by spam
delivery attempts?



sa-exim with spamassassin rejects mail at SMTP time which may solve your
problem


I was _already_ talking about rejecting mail at SMTP time.

Daniel

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address
  - From: Glenn English <ghe@slsware.com>

References:
- minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address
  - From: "Daniel B." <REMOVEdanielTHIS@fgm.com>
- Re: minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address
  - From: Clive Menzies <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk>