Re: minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address
From: Clive Menzies <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:36:16 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060215183616.GG4595@clivemenzies.co.uk>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 43F36BB3.2050002@fgm.com>
References: <[🔎] 43F36BB3.2050002@fgm.com>

On (15/02/06 12:58), Daniel B. wrote:
> What anti-spam method minimizes the network bandwith used by spam
> delivery attempts?

sa-exim with spamassassin rejects mail at SMTP time which may solve your
problem

I put up some notes on setting up a mail-server including spam and virus
filtering:

http://www.clivemenzies.co.uk/selfhelp/MailServer.html

/usr/share/doc/sa-exim/README.Debian is a good reference

Regards

Clive

-- 
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address
  - From: "Daniel B." <REMOVEdanielTHIS@fgm.com>

References:
- minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address
  - From: "Daniel B." <REMOVEdanielTHIS@fgm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Postgresql pg_autovacuum in Sarge?
Next by Date: 2.6 kernel on PowerEdge 1850?
Previous by thread: minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address
Next by thread: Re: minimizing bandwidth taken be spam delivery attempts even when identifiable by "To:" address
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread