On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:19:17 -0800 Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:13:46 +0000 > Clive Menzies <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk> wrote: > > > On (18/01/06 21:35), Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > I have several extraneous printers in my Firefox (1.07) print dialog > > > in my pure sid system. They each end @:64 (such as hppsc1200@:64). > > > The archives at > > > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/06/msg00282.html > > > > > > suggest this is caused by Xprint being installed. I really don't care > > > that these printers exist, except that they don't work correctly. I > > > normally print with CUPS but the CUPS printers are not the default > > > forcing me to manually select them each time :-( > > > > > > Okay, so, per the thread referenced above, > > > > > > sudo apt-get --purge remove xprint okay, this works just great. I did it from an x-term with firefox sdtill running... woooo scary. No problems except the firefox print dialog was slow to start until I had killed and restarted firefox. that is all.. A > > > > > > causes the always scary "other packages to be removed: > > > x-window-system" etc etc etc. I'm pretty sure this is a meta-package > > > and is not critical, especially as the whole operation will only free > > > up about 4500k of disc space, which seems small to me for the entire > > > x-window-system to be heading for the bin. > > > > > > So my questions: 1) are my assumptions regarding the meta-package > > > correct? That is, I may break the meta-package, but not impact the > > > underlying actual packages. > > > 2) seeing as I'm pretty sure I don't actually use xprint, are there > > > any reasons for keeping it around tht I might not be aware of? Such > > > as, "its better than cups" or the like. the xprint website, while > > > extensive couldn't really answer this fundamental question for me. > > > > I can't remember the detail but I, like you, hesitated to remove xprint > > in spite of the annoyances you refer to. When I bit the bullet it was > > fine; to be on the safe side you may want to make the changes from a > > console rather than xterminal just in case something gets borked in your > > X setup; recovery would be pretty straightforward that way. > > yeah, my thoughts too. Since you jumped in ahead of me... ;) I'll give it a whirl and see what happens. > > thanks > > A > > > > > Regards > > > > Clive > > > > -- > > www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... > > ...strategies for business > > > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > > >
Attachment:
pgpxOVpHP8P6e.pgp
Description: PGP signature