Re: GMail like offline email client
Evolution is good, but i cant read mailing lists in it, because i loose thread :)
I've found that sylpheed has the ability of displayng thread in tree view so i switched to it
the only thing i miss - is a filter rule, which can react on email addresses which are in my address book (such filter i saw in thunderbird, but it is tooo heavy)
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:15:55 -0600, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>:
> On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 14:54 -0600, Javier-Elias Vasquez-Vivas wrote:
> > On 1/20/06, Adam Fabian <awfabian@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > =?KOI8-R?B?98nUwczJyiDp3cXOy88=?= <betalb@gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Are there any any email clients with similar features as in gmail
> > > > online web interface
> > > >
> > > > 1) queues -- vital ;) Very handy feature
> > >
> > > I can't think of any Gmail feature called a queue, and I'm quite
> > > familiar with it.
> > >
> > > > 2) shortkuts -- not vital, but good feature...
> > >
> > > If you mean shortcut keys, most good email clients have those already.
> > >
> > > Though I don't know what a queue is, the email client that reminds me
> > > most of GMail in every way is the email client built into the opera
> > > web-browser. I think it's called M2 or something like that.
> >
> > Maybe he's asking about labels? That's kind of the gmail feature I
> > wouldn't find in any email client. It would be sort of email
> > directories as under any email client plus soft links between them?
> > Any ways, if someone knows about such thing I would like to know as
> > well, :)
>
> That might be similar to Evolution vFolders, now in v2.4 name-
> changed to Search Folders.
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Ron Johnson, Jr.
> Jefferson, LA USA
>
> "Peace, in international affairs, is a period of cheating between
> two periods of fighting."
> Ambrose Bierce
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: