Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:57:45 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87zmm2ve92.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 43C53C3B.9050707@free.fr> (niouze.pouint.theo@free.fr's message of "Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:11:23 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 20060111142805.GA5531@topoi.pooq.com> <[🔎] 87d5iywwx5.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> <[🔎] 43C53C3B.9050707@free.fr>

I wrote:
> Don't forget non-DE as well.

Theo writes:
> Is there something specific about Germany ?

Games.
-- 
John Hasler

Reply to:

References:
- FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
  - From: hendrik@topoi.pooq.com
- Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
  - From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
- Re: FAT patents. Do we need to revive non-US?
  - From: theo <niouze.pouint.theo@free.fr>