[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Linux Distribution Chooser

Chris Howie wrote:

Steve Lamb wrote:
Or the system is going to have multiple users who might want different DEs.

And if that's the case then you select both of them during the install.

I still haven't
uninstalled Gnome, something I've been meaning to do for a long time, but
haven't had the willpower to spend that much time hunting down every last
unneeded package.
Hardly Debian's fault there.

Except that Debian put Gnome there when all I selected was "Desktop
environment."  Come on, you know that Linux users tend to value specificity.
WHICH desktop environment?  I would be very happy to see the tasksel setup show
exactly what is being installed, e.g.
Well, I guess that you can do that by selecting "Whatever" and "manual package selection". This way you can see exactly what's going to be installed.

* Mail server (Exim)
* Web server (Apache 2)
* Desktop environment (X.org, KDE, Gnome)
* DNS server (Bind 9)

And the like.  Sure, you can always opt for the
select-nothing-and-apt-get-it-later approach, but let's be realistic.  At least
let me know what *exactly* I'm signing up for so I can avoid it.  And really,
how bad can a separate option for KDE and Gnome be?  I mean, while we're
getting KDE and Gnome, why not icewm, xfce4, and fluxbox?  Why should we stop
with two bloated environments when we can have two bloated environments and a
million lightweight ones?  Are we trying to see how much space we can burn?

How hard can it be to give the user a choice during the install, and why is
that such a stupid idea according to you?


Gabriel Parrondo
Linux User #404138

"In theory there's no difference between the theory and the practice. In the practice There is."

Reply to: