[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OpenOffice.org HUGE fonts, ugly UI



On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 09:53:43PM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:

> Brian Clark wrote:

> >Hi Debian users,

> >I just upgraded my testing's OpenOffice.org, and the user interface
> >fonts are huge. My wild guess says maybe 24 point. In addition to that,
> >I now see a super ugly silvery user interface which doesn't look like my
> >currently configured GTK 1 or 2 themes. 

> >~$ dpkg -l | grep openoffice
> >ii  openoffice.org          2.0.0-5      OpenOffice.org Office suite 
> >version 2.0
> >ii  openoffice.org-base     2.0.0-5      OpenOffice.org office suite - 
> >database
> >ii  openoffice.org-calc     2.0.0-5      OpenOffice.org office suite - 
> >spreadsheet
> >ii  openoffice.org-common   2.0.0-5      OpenOffice.org office suite 
> >architecture independent files
> >ii  openoffice.org-core     2.0.0-5      OpenOffice.org office suite 
> >architecture dependent files
> >ii  openoffice.org-draw     2.0.0-5      OpenOffice.org office suite - 
> >drawing
> >ii  openoffice.org-gnome    2.0.0-5      GNOME Integration for 
> >OpenOffice.org (Widgets, Dialogs, VFS, G
> >ii  openoffice.org-gtk-gnom 2.0.0-5      Transitional package to 
> >openoffice.org-gnome
> >ii  openoffice.org-impress  2.0.0-5      OpenOffice.org office suite - 
> >presentation
> >ii  openoffice.org-java-com 2.0.0-5      OpenOffice.org office suite Java 
> >support arch. independent fil
> >ii  openoffice.org-l10n-en- 2.0.0-5      English_american language package 
> >for OpenOffice.org
> >ii  openoffice.org-math     2.0.0-5      OpenOffice.org office suite - 
> >equation editor
> >ii  openoffice.org-writer   2.0.0-5      OpenOffice.org office suite - 
> >word processor

> >Does anyone have any idea where to begin to fix this? 

> >Thanks for reading!

> Did you try moving the old .openoffice* to some other directory and 
> restarting openoffice again?

Hi raju,

Just tried that, and it did not change. Thanks for the suggestion.

-- 
Brian Clark



Reply to: