Re: newbies needing help for graphic login
On (06/01/06 12:18), Andy Streich wrote:
> I really appreciate this topic and am delighted to see experienced Debian
> users responding positively to the "help, help" emails. Andrew's question is
> the critical one: is Debian for newbies or not? From my own experience over
> the last couple of years I'd say it is not -- unless the newbie has strong
> technical skills and lots and lots of time to read manuals and this email
> list and getting the system up-and-running quickly is not critical. Without
> a prior Unix/Linux background or the dedicated help of a local expert, you
> have to approach Debian at the very least as a time consuming, very technical
> hobby.
I disagree about strong technical skills but you need some time and
motivation to learn. The 'new' sarge installer it is a lot easier
than installing woody.
> I think many in the community would say, "But that's as it should be. If you
> don't have the dedication to figure things out, go to another distro, stick
> with Windows, or buy a Mac." To me that's short sighted. If Debian is to
> remain vital, it needs to keep attracting new users.
It clearly does attract new users, often those who've tried a derivative
distro but want something more. That said, it would be nigh on
impossible to satisfy all potential users; however, between the range of
derivative distros and debian itself, most needs are covered.
>
> In addition to the other suggestions on how to improve the newbie experience,
> I would add creating yet another mailing list specifically for people trying
> to establish a stable installation. Like other diehards on this list I can
> filter 150 emails/day. That's not true for all and a newbie especially.
I've never filtered the list mail (incl. boot, powerpc and user) because
I learn so much from reading about other people's problems and
solutions. As a newbie, most of it went over my head but over time,
much of it began to make sense.
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
Reply to: