Re: Udev and storage devices
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Udev and storage devices
- From: Jacob S <stormspotter@6Texans.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 11:52:20 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20060102115220.5fc959b3@jacob.6texans.net>
- In-reply-to: <d559b4c0512310955l2089e9d5u6f22363e048ce8e2@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20051228104551.7fd37436@jacob.6texans.net> <d559b4c0512281152x63c77ffdn7d321fc7ec3b3e16@mail.gmail.com> <20051230165122.4e7adf4c@jacob.6texans.net> <43B6A324.5040201@hotmail.com> <20051231094623.7b08f900@jacob.6texans.net> <d559b4c0512310955l2089e9d5u6f22363e048ce8e2@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:55:16 +0000
"L.V.Gandhi" <lvgandhi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/31/05, Jacob S <stormspotter@6texans.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > I would agree with you, except I found autofs wouldn't work with
> > symlinks. It wanted to be pointed at the real device. So I put the
> > name and symlink params to their current values.
> >
> > I also would have avoided autofs, except that I couldn't find a KDE
> > equivalent to hal.
>
> Autofs works ok for me. See the page
> http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/127
Yes, autofs works for me in that configuration as well. But they are
doing the same thing I did - point autofs to the real /dev names,
instead of /dev symlinks. It is only when pointing autofs to /dev/
symlinks that I have problems, but that is no big deal.
Thanks,
Jacob
Reply to: