Re: Aptitude erroneously thinks many packages are unused and wants to remove them.

[Clive Menzies <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk>]

On (01/08/05 13:56), Bryan Donlan wrote:
> On 8/1/05, Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/1/05, Clive Menzies <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk> wrote:
> > > On (01/08/05 12:32), Adam Funk wrote:
> > > > Inspired by the advice on this group and the -s option, I'm trying out
> > > > aptitude.  But I'm surprised by this:
> > > >
> > > > $ aptitude -s upgrade
> > > > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > > > Building Dependency Tree
> > > > Reading extended state information
> > > > Initializing package states... Done
> > > > Reading task descriptions... Done
> > > > The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED:
> > > >
> > > > followed by a long list of packages, some of which I'm running right now.
> > > > How does aptitude determine this list, and what's the best way to correct
> > > > it?
> > > >
> > > There've been a few posts on this over the last few days; have a look at
> > > the d-u list archive.
> > >
> > > Briefly, run aptitude in interactive mode - ie # aptitude
> > > If you press g (only once), the proposed actions will be displayed, you
> > > can then 'h' hold packages you don't want removed.
> > 
> > A better option is '+' - 'h' will disable updates.
> 
> Correction, '=' will disable updates, 'h' doesn't do anything afaik
> 
Yes, my bad .... I was thinking of what's displayed on the left ;(

'+' looks useful .... must go back to the man page

Thanks

Clive

-- 
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business