[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Compiled 2.6.14, seeing strange things...



Hi.

I compiled 2.6.14 since I like having the framebuffer support and the 
Debian pre-packaged kernels don't have it in with 2.6.14, as well as 
headaches with yaboo (or whatever the heck it is) initrd generator. 
So I built it without initrd, and with ext3 compiled in.

When I enabled preemption, I noticed that the system (2.8GHz P4 
laptop) became very jerky and pulling the mouse across the screen was 
an exercise in patience.

I recompiled without preemption, and while mouse/keyboard response has 
improved almost to Debian-precompiled quality, now something else is 
happening:

Top:

top - 20:12:52 up 26 min,  1 user,  load average: 1.14, 0.92, 0.77
Tasks: 108 total,   1 running, 107 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s):  1.0% us,  3.0% sy,  0.0% ni, 50.8% id,  0.0% wa, 31.8% hi, 
13.4% si
Mem:    513592k total,   507528k used,     6064k free,     3124k 
buffers
Swap:  1510068k total,        4k used,  1510064k free,   359196k 
cached

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
  837 root      16   0     0    0    0 S 17.3  0.0   1:25.21 kjournald
 4759 curt      15   0 51244 8812 7116 S  5.7  1.7   1:05.52 kio_ftp
 4670 curt      15   0 23340 2932 1688 S  1.0  0.6   0:02.96 
dcopserver
 4710 curt      15   0 28560  14m  11m S  0.3  3.0   0:02.54 konsole
 4755 curt      16   0 48912  27m  20m S  0.3  5.6   0:02.75 kmail

17% kjournald? Now, true, it's running an ftp, but it's only 300kBps. 
I have done full 100Mbps ethernet dumps that didn't blink an eye.

Not only that, but every 5 seconds, the commit time for the ext3 
journal, there is a noticable 1/2 second pause in keyboard/software 
response. This has not happened at all with the Debian compiled 
kernels.

If someone wants to discuss this, I would love to share kernel build 
config files and such to try and find where this is "going wrong".

Curt-


-- 
September 11th, 2001
The proudest day for gun control and central 
planning advocates in American history



Reply to: