Re: [syntaxis@gmail.com: Re: portrserve, gidreserve, was Re: Debian Weekly News - October 25th]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:57:11PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, D. Joe Anderson wrote:
> > As per the recommendation below, I'm forwarding this.
> >
> > ----- Forwarded message from Andrew Saunders <syntaxis@gmail.com> -----
> >
> > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:23:08 +0100
> > From: Andrew Saunders <syntaxis@gmail.com>
> > To: deejoe@raccoon.com
> > Subject: Re: portrserve, gidreserve, was Re: Debian Weekly News - October 25th
> >
> > On 10/25/05, D. Joe Anderson <deejoe@raccoon.com> wrote:
> >
> > > You know, a gidreserve or uidreserve would be useful too.
> > Very interesting, but why did you send this to -user? I recommend you
> > re-post this to debian-devel so that the devs actually become aware of
> > it.
>
> Edit /etc/adduser.conf.
So maybe -user was probably the right place to begin after all?
Anyway, thanks for the reply, Adam. That does indeed seem like
what I need the next time this comes up.
--
D. Joe Anderson http://www.etrumeus.com/~deejoe
". . . we could end up with a situation where it's legal to own
hardware that automatically fires bullets really fast but
illegal to have software that automatically fires bits really
fast. -- Jenny Reiswig"
Reply to: