[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IDE hdd faster than sata? How come?



Bruno Buys wrote:
How good is hdparm benchmark for sata? What am I missing here?


frank:/home/bruno# hdparm -Tt /dev/sda

/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads:   2368 MB in  2.00 seconds = 1183.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads:  170 MB in  3.01 seconds =  56.56 MB/sec


frank:/home/bruno# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads:   2352 MB in  2.00 seconds = 1176.18 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads:  180 MB in  3.03 seconds =  59.47 MB/sec


IDE disk is SAMSUNG SP0802N, FwRev=TK200-04. 80GB. udma5.
Sata is SAMSUNG SP0812C SATA 80GB.


The only thing I found was in samsung website "The drive comes defaulted to udma100. To enable udma133 refer to www.samsung.com.br". So far, www.samsung.com.br gives me nothing.


No clue.
but I have exactly the same ATA Samsung disk.
That gives:

 Timing cached reads:   1348 MB in  2.01 seconds = 671.75 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  164 MB in  3.00 seconds =  54.64 MB/sec

Same udma5.
But smartctl -A -v 194,unknown /dev/hdc gives:
...
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 195 000 Old_age Always - 92
...

And a few days ago when running Sarge on one of its partitions I got all sorts of trouble:
...
kernel: Buffer I/O error on device hdb3, logical block 163858
kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on hdb3
...
kernel: EXT2-fs error (device hdb3): ext2_readdir: bad page in #83892
kernel: Remounting filesystem read-only
...

That disk is 6 months old!
So I am going to get rid of the Samsung and get something else.

H








Reply to: