Re: 4ol 4rt files:
On Saturday 24 September 2005 11:56 am, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (24/09/05 09:50), Paul E Condon wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:16:29AM -0600, Jules Dubois wrote:
> > > On Friday 23 September 2005 21:55, Paul Johnson <email@example.com>
> > >
> > > (<[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>) wrote:
> > > > On Friday 23 September 2005 07:57 pm, John Hasler wrote:
> > > >> Paul Johnson writes:
> > > >> > So why do you do it? It's the first followup that starts a
> > > >> > thread, after all.
> > > >>
> > > >> Read the subject line. Do you see anything odd about it?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, but my point is, you're asking people to *not* do exactly what
> > > > you're doing. Then there's the comically ironic explanation as to
> > > > why you shouldn't followup to what you're following up to...
> > >
> > > Then there's the comically ironic failure to notice that "4ol 4rt" will
> > > not generate any Google hits for the clueless.
> > OK, I'm clueless about this thread. I just googled "4ol 4rt", without
> > quotes and got 246 results and a query: "Did you mean: 4 ol 4rt" Would
> > someone please explain? (Privately, if you don't wish to extend this
> > thread further.)
> At the risk of perpetuating more hits from the uninitiated ....
> Google on: aol art files
> The list is 3rd hit
It's one particular message, with 2 follow ups. Perhaps the best thing to do
is add a number of replies saying this is the last place to go to find help
I'll try adding one -- which should show up soon.