On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:40:07PM +0200, mess-mate wrote: > Simo Kauppi <swk@nic.fi> wrote: > | On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:04:35PM +0200, mess-mate wrote: > | > Wang Xu <gnawux@gmail.com> wrote: > | > | > The exact error is: > | > | > 'You passed an unappropriate mode number..' and i have to press > | > | > 'return' to see an available choice about: > | > | > 80x40 > | > | > 80x30 > | > | > 80x32 > | > | > etc... > | > | > > | > | > mess-mate > | > | > | > | > | > | And did you build framebuffer support into kernel? It should be > | > | built into kernel directly rather than as modules. > | > | > | > | > | > yes, i did; fb16 and vesa. > | > At the head of possible values to choice is displayed: > | > VESA VGA > | > > | > > | > mess-mate > | > -- > | > You will be singled out for promotion in your work. > | > > | If you use vesafb, the values according to the kernel documentation are: > | > | | 640x480 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 > | ----+------------------------------------- > | 256 | 0x301 0x303 0x305 0x307 > | 32k | 0x310 0x313 0x316 0x319 > | 64k | 0x311 0x314 0x317 0x31A > | 16M | 0x312 0x315 0x318 0x31B > | > | Simo > | -- > I know and tryed sowhat every 640x480 and 800x600 :( > Also the decimal and hexadecimal numbers. > > mess-mate > -- > Beware of low-flying butterflies. Ah, sorry, I didn't notice your original posting. Did you try vga=ask to see what modes are available and perhaps do a `scan' at the prompt? Simo -- :r ~/.signature
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature