On Tuesday, 06.09.2005 at 17:54 -0600, Ben Pearre wrote: > Made ya look! Actually I love Mutt, mostly... You had me worried there, for a moment :-P > I know this thread is increasingly off-topic, but I'm going to throw > in my one Mutt annoyance and see if anyone has a solution. I asked on > mutt-user a couple of years ago and got no useful reply... > > How do I tell Mutt to PGP-encrypt any message for which all recipients > have keys in my keyring? I think Kmail does this, so it's really an > embarassment that Mutt doesn't (didn't?) support it. Any hints? Use > the Source, Cuke? I was starting in on that but got distracted by > research. D'oh! There's no explicit option for this, AFAIK. You can choose to "always encrypt", which I guess will simply fail if you don't have the appropriate keys. Alternatively, you could write a short script which reads the output of "gpg --list-keys" and writes out part of your ~/.muttrc with hooks to 'always encrypt' for those users. I don't think there's any reliable way to deal with the situation where a message sent is to multiple recipients, some of whom you have keys for and some of whom you do not, though. How does KMail's logic work there? I assume it's more than simply "always encrypt"? Dave. -- Please don't CC me on list messages! ... Dave Ewart - davee@sungate.co.uk - jabber: davee@jabber.org All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/ Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature