[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian & Interjets....



I know I'm a little late to the party but I found someone doing this
just recently, very cool.

FreeBSD/General: http://www.alaska.net/~royce/interjet/
GNU/Linux: 
http://www.aptalaska.net/~matt.s/interjet/Readme.txt
http://www.alaska.net/~royce/interjet/projects/firewall/schubox.html
http://www.aptalaska.net/~matt.s/interjet/

Related: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=InterJet%2C+Linux&btnG=Search

Happy Hacking,
//kracker

Audio: Sole : Selling Live Water : The Priziest Horse

On 4/2/05, Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> on Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:49:56PM -0900, bdk (bdk@thirdmason.com) wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone ever gotten Debian to run on an Whistler Interjet? They were
> > initially designed to run BSD and operate as a email, web, ftp, router,
> > etc solution back in the dialup days.
> >
> > The only thing that shows up is "LIL" of LILO and then it just stops.
> 
> This is a LILO error covered in /usr/share/doc/lilo/Manual.txt.gz:
> 
>        LIL   The second stage boot loader has been started, but it can't
>        load the descriptor table from the map file. This is typically
>        caused by a media failure or by a geometry mismatch.
> 
> Doublecheck your partitioning.  If you can run a media check, do so.
> Rerun lilo.
> 
> 
> > It is a 486 DX4 processor with 16mb of ram.
> 
> That's pretty lightweight but should provide basic console access and/or
> firewall duties.
> 
> > OR does anyone know of a how-to on switching the bootloader from lilo
> > to syslinux? There is some mention that it needs Syslinux as a loader
> > to work, info may be outdated though.
> 
> GIYF ;-)
> 
> 
> Peace.
> 
> --
> Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
>  What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
>     Non-coders who think they know better than experienced coders are...noise.
>     - Jeff Waugh, describing the GNOME Project's user-feedback philosophy
>       http://zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/2004-January/008588.html
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFCTzY1efG8443k044RAgSqAJ48cVj2kshk4J/Mo4m8c61/1biqHwCdF/+Q
> yhD00oPZISunaRwG5UgTgfI=
> =3V4L
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
>



Reply to: