Re: What happened to kernel-image 2.6.12
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 06:48:40PM -0400, Rick Friedman wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 August 2005 06:15 pm, Tom Allison wrote:
> > I guess I haven't been paying attention much lately. But where did the
> > kernel-image 2.6.12 go?
> >
> > There is a linux-image 2.6.12 out there, but nothing to indicate that
> > this is a replacement to the kernel-image...
> >
> > Which one do I use?
> > Any other goodies to watch out for?
>
> Use linux-image 2.6.12. They renamed it in preparation for other kernel
> packages (hurd, etc.)
Both linux-image-k7 and linux-image-2.6-k7 currently depend on
linux-image-2.6.12-2-k7 but only linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 is available.
Is that a bug that should be reported?
--
"It is absurd to divide people into good and bad. People
are either charming or tedious." -- Oscar Wilde
Rick Pasotto rick@niof.net http://www.niof.net
Reply to: