[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Q re missing rc.local file



On Thursday 04 August 2005 12:47, Bob Proulx wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I have a fairly lengthy list of things I've added to
>> the /etc/rc.d/rc.local file, which is softlinked from S99local in
>> the various rcX.d directories in RH & Fedora and is the last thing
>> executed before the login screen in a RG/Fedora runlevel 3 boot.
>
>On Debian there is no difference (by default) to the different run
>levels.  This is an often confusing point to people switching to
>Debian.  And the converse that run levels are meaningful to people
>switching to Red Hat.

Yes, among other things if its setup for a graphical login, but I want 
to first do a text login followed by a startx.  How then is this 
accomplished?

[...]

>There is no default "local" rc script.  Which is perhaps a shame
>because this is an often asked question.  But there is a template
> that you can use to easily create one for yourself.
>
>  cd /etc/init.d
>  cp skeleton localrc
>  editor localrc  # edit as you desire

Ahh, that I can handle.  I take it it gets sourced if it exists as 
localrc?
>
>That file has examples of almost everything in it.  You won't need
>almost everything in your copy.  Please delete what you don't need.
>In fact it may be better to pick an active working script and use it
>instead.  You will be ahead in terms of avoiding the noise.  But
>skeleton is still a good example because it does have a lot of
> stuff.
>
>  cp cron localrc
>  editor localrc  # edit as you desire
>
>Of course that is a traditional daemon startup.  If you just want to
>run commands then you might find hwclock.sh more to your liking.
>
>  cp cron localrc
>  editor localrc  # edit as you desire
>
>In any case, there is a tool to set up the symlinks that can be
>thought of as a chkconfig like tool.
>
>  update-rc.d localrc defaults
>
>This is really a scripting interface.  So normally users don't need
> to know about the command.  But it is used in packages in the
> postinst script.  And the reverse removal is 'update-rc.d localrc
> remove'.

But, what do I do it aI want to remove boinc, but not setibatch?  
Obviously we're back to hand editing.  I'm capable of that.

Maybe a different tack needs to be taken by way of having an etc/local 
dir, and anything placed it it gets sourced at startup?  Is something 
like that possible in the future?

Thanks Bob.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.



Reply to: