[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 884MB instead of 1024MB memory and HIGHMEM enabled

On Tuesday, 02.08.2005 at 15:25 +0200, sYs wrote:

> >Those timestamps above suggest to me that the kernel was *compiled* on
> >'July 26', but that it was *installed* on 'Aug 1' - that alone doesn't
> >necessarily indicate a problem.
> >
> >Dave.
> > 
> >
> Do you think that the *config-* is the configuration file 
> for the *current running kernel*, is it sure?

It *looks* like it *is* the config for the current running kernel, but I
don't think there's any way to be certain.

> If it is, what's the problem? :\

Hard to say.  Perhaps recompile the kernel again and double-check the
HIGHMEM settings.

Please don't CC me on list messages!
Dave Ewart - davee@sungate.co.uk - jabber: davee@jabber.org
All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/
Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: