Re: sarge or etch?

[Lorenzo Taylor <lorenzo@taylor.homelinux.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Clive Menzies's comments on Re: sarge or etch? were as follows:
# You, Carl, are an experienced Debian user; would you really suggest a
# newcomer to debian, install from etch?

<PersonalOpinion>
	I feel that since sarge is stable and only about a month has passed
	since its release date, it is the best for the new convert.  The
	installer and packages have been thoroughly tested and yet they are all
	fairly new versions.  2 months ago, I would have proposed using a Sarge
	NetInst CD (Testing) over Woody (Stable), but Sarge is stable now, so I
	would recommend installing from it.  Then, it is quite painless to
	upgrade to Etch or even Sid if you like the latest versions of
	everything right away.
</PersonalOpinion>
Lorenzo
- -- 
- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s:+ a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W++ N o K- w---
O M V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5+ X+ R tv-- b++ DI-- D+
G e* h---- r+++ y+++
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCzy0KG9IpekrhBfIRAmlyAJ4jgJlZWXQcV6OzNZVHTMNlvdsbVgCcDYCC
4XOtWgkwsUV+AMQJ3o7SY48=
=z+q5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----