On Sunday 03 Jul 2005 09:29, Steve Lamb wrote: > Lee Braiden wrote: > > root needs to be responsible, trustworthy, and trusted. Since root can > > do virtually anything, it makes no sense to *try* to hide things from > > him/her. The best you can do is to obscure things, so that root won't > > accidentally find them out without trying to. If you don't trust root, > > your security is *gone*, anyway. > > The alternative is much worse. I learned that on NT when I > accidentally droped admin privledges from all accounts. :/ I'm not sure what you're getting at. The alternative of not having anyone who is trusted? -- Lee Braiden http://www.DigitalUnleashed.com
Attachment:
pgpOZhVeWj0L_.pgp
Description: PGP signature