[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Top posting (a different point of view)



On Saturday June 11 2005 3:21 am, Joe Potter wrote:
> Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> > Joe Potter wrote:

> We are talking about how one should post in this mail-list. We have
> a very high volume list, and most have other things to do besides
> read the list on a continual basis.

I argue that this doesn't apply solely to this mailing list by a long 
shot, everybody has other things to do than read their email on a 
continual basis[1].

> So, post at the bottom and trim out the stuff that is not necessary
> to understanding your reply.

Is that really so much better than top-posting?  Not even you are 
bottom-posting.

http://ursine.ca/Top_Posting#Why_bottom-posting_also_isn.27t_the_answer

> >> Gates is a cancer, and the after life will be warm
> >> in his case if there is justice.
> >
> > *plonk* Religious zealot.
>
> "plonk" ??  Did you get the part in "Revenge of the Nerds, part
> 12"?

He thinks he's cute and doesn't realize that plonking makes you look 
like a luser and generally defeats the point of filters.  Filters 
work better when the targets don't know...



[1] Well, most of the time, anyway.  And even when you do have the 
time, usually there's something more productive or social to do.  
Unless you're a security guard on night shift at a hospital like I 
used to be, then that's pretty much all you do.  And even then, top 
posting is still anti-social and obnoxious and you wish you had 
something better to do than read email all night every night...

-- 
Paul Johnson
Email and Instant Messenger (Jabber): baloo@ursine.ca
http://ursine.ca/~baloo/

Attachment: pgpU8IV5ms4EZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: