[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

nfs failure after woody r6 update



I update our woody servers to r6 and our nfs suddenly stopped working. At 
least the timing was about right. However, I didn't see anything in the 
update that would effect nfs. 

I restarted the nfs servers: 
zan:~# /etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server stop
Stopping NFS kernel daemon: mountd nfsd.
Unexporting directories for NFS kernel daemon...done.
zan:~# /etc/init.d/nfs-common restart
Stopping NFS common utilities: statd.
Starting NFS common utilities: statd.
zan:~# /etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server start
Exporting directories for NFS kernel daemon...done.
Starting NFS kernel daemon: nfsd mountd.

Here is my /etc/exports:
/mirror/share 
*(rw,sync,wdelay,hide,secure,no_root_squash,no_all_squash,no_subtree_check,secure_locks,mapping=identity,anonuid=-2,anongid=-2)
/mirror/home 
*(rw,sync,wdelay,hide,secure,no_root_squash,no_all_squash,no_subtree_check,secure_locks,mapping=identity,anonuid=-2,anongid=-2)

172.16.32.9 is my workstation which automounts /mirror/share and /mirror/home. 

Here is what I see in syslog:
Jun  3 11:04:09 zan rpc.mountd: Caught signal 15, un-registering and exiting.
Jun  3 11:04:09 zan kernel: nfsd: last server has exited
Jun  3 11:04:09 zan kernel: nfsd: unexporting all filesystems
Jun  3 11:04:19 zan rpc.statd[28138]: Caught signal 15, un-registering and 
exiting.
Jun  3 11:04:20 zan rpc.statd[29086]: Version 1.0 Starting
Jun  3 11:08:01 zan /USR/SBIN/CRON[29188]: (mail) CMD (  if [ -x 
/usr/sbin/exim -a -f /etc/exim/exim.conf ]; then /usr/sbin/exim -q ; fi)
Jun  3 11:12:12 zan kernel: svc: bad direction 65536, dropping request
Jun  3 11:12:12 zan kernel: svc: bad direction 65536, dropping request
Jun  3 11:13:48 zan rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from 
172.16.32.9:818 for /mirror/share (/mirror/share)
Jun  3 11:14:10 zan rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from 
172.16.32.9:818 for /mirror/share (/mirror/share)
Jun  3 11:15:02 zan last message repeated 2 times


Any ideas?

Thanks,
Tom



Reply to: