Re: Poll results: User views on the FDL issue

To: <debian-project@lists.debian.org>, <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Poll results: User views on the FDL issue
From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:19:18 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E1DOHv4-0004Ks-00@pipe.localnet>
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:46:37 -0300 <[🔎] 1114008397.4194.3.camel@alface.horta>
References: <[🔎] 20050419051333.GH28903@bignachos.com> <[🔎] 1114008397.4194.3.camel@alface.horta>

Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Very few responses for an universe as big as debian-user, I think.
> http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-user.png

Thanks for that!

For the non-graphical, http://lists.debian.org/stats/ claims 2598
subscribers. So 28 responses is 1.08%, which would be a very low
response rate for a postal survey. I'm not sure whether email is
better or worse than letter post, but stuff I've read (like Shel
Horowitz's Grassroots Marketing) makes me think that it's about
the same (as higher volume cancels out lower response cost).
Anyone know better?

-- 
MJR/slef
http://people.debian.org/~mjr/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Poll results: User views on the FDL issue
  - From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>

References:
- Poll results: User views on the FDL issue
  - From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
- Re: Poll results: User views on the FDL issue
  - From: Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: history of system
Next by Date: Re: history of system
Previous by thread: Re: Poll results: User views on the FDL issue
Next by thread: Re: Poll results: User views on the FDL issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread