Re: POLL: Should Debian remove all GNU FDL-licensed documentation?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: POLL: Should Debian remove all GNU FDL-licensed documentation?
From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:04:32 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050414160432.GA15397@bignachos.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050414034938.GC7651@bignachos.com>
References: <[🔎] 20050414034938.GC7651@bignachos.com>

On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 08:49:38PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> 5. Is Debian making a big out of a minor issue?  Should Debian be
                           ^
			   deal/fuss/hoopla/spat ...

-- 
Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to
pretend to like each other.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: POLL: Should Debian remove all GNU FDL-licensed documentation?
  - From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>

References:
- POLL: Should Debian remove all GNU FDL-licensed documentation?
  - From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: cannot eject or retract cdrom tray anymore
Next by Date: Re: java et sarje could not find libjava.so
Previous by thread: Re: POLL: Should Debian remove all GNU FDL-licensed documentation?
Next by thread: Re: POLL: Should Debian remove all GNU FDL-licensed documentation?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread