[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

re:gkrellm



hi ya 

On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, hja123 wrote:

> alvin & gene:
> 
> Sorry, I have jumped to the conclusion too fast. The summary of
> sensors-detect is as follows.

it would have been 100x faster to just install those modules
and see if lm_sensors saw any data ..

	- cat /proc/...lm_sensor..stuff.. 
	- sensors
	- any other way you wanna read the data

we cannot answer the question for you, sicne we do not have
the motherboard in front of us

c ya
alvin

> Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x2e
> Chip `Analog Devices ADM1027, ADT7460 or ADT7463' (confidence: 8)

looks good to me
 
> Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x50
> Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8)

good

> * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at c400' (Algorithm unavailable)
> Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x52
> Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8)

good
 
> Driver `to-be-written' (should be inserted):
> Detects correctly:
> * ISA bus address 0x06e0 (Busdriver `i2c-isa')
> Chip `Nat. Semi. PC87372 Super IO Fan Sensors' (confidence: 9)

good

> #----cut here----
> # I2C adapter drivers
> i2c-i801
> i2c-isa
> # I2C chip drivers
> lm85
> eeprom
> # no driver for Nat. Semi. PC87372 Super IO Fan Sensors yet
> #----cut here----

and did you install each of those modules ??

> The last comment about no driver for Nat. Semi. chip is a tell-all,
> isn't it?

you tell us ...  you have the machine .. you have the list of modules ..
you have the list of chips it think it found ...

c ya
alvin



Reply to: