Re: rbl server
Alvin Oga wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Adam Aube wrote:
>
>> Came across this link on another list - an attempt to do some
>> semi-objective research on the effectiveness of various RBLs.
>>
>> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg/current/msg11826.html
>
> i think in order to do an effective comparison,
>
> you need to use the same spam and see which rbl catches it or not
>
> once the 1st rbl finds it, the 2nd and 3rd rbl's listed will not need
> to go checking itself for the same, and would seem like its not
> catching something, when it could be if it was listed first
You mean like the author of the linked post said he did?
"Unlike some seemingly similar charts, we have queried all the lists for
every message, so the consultation order doesn't affect the result"
Adam
Reply to: