[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?



hi,

i'm having a similar problem at the moment and i'm trying to figure out if it is caused by
this bug -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294404

you may have a look at a description of my case:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/03/msg03799.html
and the following discussion:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/03/msg03949.html

regards,
oliver

Am 31.03.2005 um 14:23 schrieb hjvm@freenet.de:

Hello everybody!

(I hope this is the right list to post this...) I've installed Debian sarge from the current testing on 29/03/2005 with Kernel 2.6 using four Raid1 partitions. I didn't install any additional tasks with base-config at first. Everything went fine, I was able to reboot into the system and to access the raid partitions. The root directory is on a raid partition and
even that works!
But: I started base-config and installed the desktop environment. The install went fine. But after the next reboot the system was broken. The first raid partition with root on it still worked, so I was able to boot into a minimal system. But the other three raid partitions notably with /var and /home on it didn't work, so I got lots of error messages. And now it becomes really funny: I was able to recreate the missing raid arrays manually using mdadm --create and to mount them. It worked, I could use them. Yet after another reboot they had vanished again. If I don't use base-config to install the desktop environment but fetch the packages manually with aptitude everything is fine. And if I make an install with Kernel 2.4 instead of 2.6 I can use base-config to install and
it works, too.
So it seems that using base-config after an install with Kernel 2.6 on raid partitions breaks all raid partitions except the first. As there is a simple workaround, i. e. installing the packages manually, it's not a big problem. But it took me two days to figure that out. What was I doing wrong or might it be that there is a bug in base-config? If anyone has encountered similar problems I'd be interested to hear about that. Browsing the mailing lists I see that this problem already appeared in September 2004 and was supposed to be fixed a long time ago. But apparently it isn't, at least in my
case.

Thanks
Hans-Joerg v. Mettenheim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org





Reply to: